Principles of Negligence and Product Liability Quiz

Duty of care is the responsibility to prevent harm through reasonable actions.

Causation is essential to proving negligence, showing a direct link between actions and harm.

The reasonable person standard evaluates actions based on what an objective person would do in similar circumstances.

A manufacturing defect arises during production, making the product unsafe.

Product liability law aims to ensure manufacturers are responsible for harm resulting from their products.

Failure to warn occurs when a manufacturer does not provide sufficient instructions for product use.

Strict liability imposes responsibility without the need to prove fault or negligence.

Defective design refers to a flaw in product design that renders it unreasonably dangerous.

Proximate cause is the event initiating a chain leading to injury, though not always directly causing it.

Strict liability is not a defense in product liability cases.

Failure to warn is the absence of proper instructions or warnings about a product's correct usage.

Strict liability imposes responsibility without the need to prove fault or negligence.

Assumption of risk bars recovery if the plaintiff knowingly used a product despite its risks.

Res ipsa loquitur allows recovery based on the occurrence of injury without needing to prove negligence.

Compensatory damages reimburse losses, whereas punitive damages punish for severe misconduct.

Strict liability holds manufacturers responsible for product defects regardless of negligence.

Product misuse defense asserts that the plaintiff was using the product incorrectly when injured.

Strict liability in product liability imposes responsibility without requiring proof of fault.