Legal Standards for Admissibility of Expert Witness Testimony Quiz

Daubert standard is the widely used standard for admitting expert testimony based on relevance and reliability.

The primary purpose of expert witness testimony in legal proceedings is to provide specialized knowledge or opinion to assist the trier of fact.

Familiarity with the legal system is not a typical qualification for someone to be considered an expert witness.

The Daubert standard is a criteria-based approach for determining the admissibility of expert testimony, focusing on relevance and reliability.

The Daubert standard was established in the case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., setting guidelines for admitting expert testimony in federal courts.

The 'gatekeeper' role of the judge involves evaluating and determining the admissibility of expert testimony.

The Frye standard is a criterion for admitting expert testimony, relying on general acceptance within the scientific community.

The Frye standard was first articulated in the case Frye v. United States, establishing the basis for admitting expert testimony.

The 'general acceptance' test under the Frye standard requires the expert's testimony to be accepted by the majority of scientists in the relevant field.

Under the Daubert standard, judges may consider factors like falsifiability, peer review, known error rates, and general acceptance when assessing the reliability of expert testimony.

The Daubert standard was codified into the Federal Rules of Evidence through Amendment 702.

A potential consequence of inadmissible expert testimony is that the case may be dismissed.

The witness's publication record is one of the factors considered in assessing the reliability of expert testimony under the Daubert standard.

Cross-examination plays a role in the evaluation of expert witness testimony by challenging the credibility and reliability of the witness's testimony.