Insanity Defense and Juvenile Justice Quiz

Legal defense asserting that a defendant should not be held criminally liable for their actions if, at the time of the crime, they were unable to understand the nature or consequences of their actions or distinguish right from wrong.

System designed to address the needs of youthful offenders through rehabilitation, education, and community-based programs, aiming to prevent future delinquent behavior.

Facilities for detaining juvenile offenders that aim to provide education, counseling, and rehabilitative services to help them reintegrate into society.

The juvenile court system aims to provide guidance, treatment, and supervision to juveniles in a manner that promotes their welfare and the safety of the community, while also ensuring their legal rights are protected.

The Miranda warning informs individuals of their constitutional rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, ensuring that any statements they make are voluntary and not the result of coercion.

The primary goal of the juvenile justice system is to rehabilitate juvenile offenders, focusing on their treatment and reintegration into society.

Legal standard used to determine insanity, focusing on whether, due to mental disease or defect, the defendant lacked substantial capacity to appreciate the criminality of their conduct or to conform their conduct to the requirements of the law.

Defense based on the idea that a child under a certain age is incapable of forming criminal intent and should not be held criminally responsible for their actions.

Legal doctrine allowing the state to act as a parent for individuals who are unable to care for themselves, often applied in cases involving minors or individuals with disabilities.

Factors typically considered include the defendant's ability to understand the charges, the ability to assist in their defense, and the ability to understand the court proceedings, but not educational background.

Competency to stand trial evaluates the defendant's mental state at the time of the trial, focusing on their ability to understand the legal proceedings and assist in their defense, while the insanity defense focuses on their mental state at the time of the crime.

Mitigating factors in juvenile sentencing typically include the juvenile's age, mental health, and prior record, but not the severity of the crime.

Supreme Court case that ruled imposing the death penalty on juveniles under 18 at the time of the crime is unconstitutional, based on the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society.

Supreme Court case that declared the death penalty for juveniles under 18 unconstitutional, citing the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.

Legal standard for insanity that focuses on whether, due to mental illness, the defendant was unable to understand the nature and quality of their actions or that their actions were wrong.

Supreme Court case that held that mandatory life sentences without parole for juveniles violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.

Legal principle presuming that children under a certain age lack the capacity to form criminal intent and should not be held criminally responsible for their actions.

Case that introduced the 'irresistible impulse' test, which focuses on whether, due to a mental disorder, the defendant was unable to control their actions or conform their behavior to the law.