#1
Which legal doctrine allows courts to ignore precedent in certain circumstances?
Distinguishing
ExplanationCourts can ignore precedent by distinguishing the current case from previous cases based on differences.
#2
What is the term for a law that retroactively changes the legal consequences of actions committed before the enactment of the law?
Ex post facto law
ExplanationEx post facto law retroactively alters the consequences of past actions, which is generally prohibited.
#3
Under what circumstance might a court apply the doctrine of 'unclean hands'?
When a party has acted in bad faith
ExplanationUnclean hands doctrine is applied when a party has acted dishonestly or in bad faith during legal proceedings.
#4
Which legal principle states that evidence obtained through illegal means cannot be used in court?
Exclusionary rule
ExplanationExclusionary rule prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings.
#5
What is the term for a legal defense in which a defendant argues that they were provoked into committing a crime?
Provocation
ExplanationProvocation is a legal defense where a defendant claims they were incited or provoked into committing the crime.
#6
What term refers to the legal principle that a person cannot be tried for the same crime twice?
Double jeopardy
ExplanationDouble jeopardy prohibits trying a person again for the same crime after acquittal or conviction.
#7
Which legal doctrine allows a court to consider past decisions made by other courts when deciding a similar case?
Stare decisis
ExplanationStare decisis allows courts to consider and follow past decisions in similar cases for consistency.
#8
Under what legal principle can a person be excused from liability for committing a crime if they were compelled to do so under threat of imminent harm or death?
Duress
ExplanationDuress allows a person to be excused from criminal liability if they committed the act under threat of imminent harm.
#9
What legal doctrine allows a defendant to escape liability by arguing that they lacked the mental capacity to understand the consequences of their actions?
Diminished capacity
ExplanationDiminished capacity is a defense arguing the defendant lacked the mental capacity to fully understand the consequences of their actions.
#10
Under what legal doctrine can a person be held criminally responsible for aiding or encouraging another person to commit a crime?
Accessory liability
ExplanationAccessory liability holds a person responsible for aiding or encouraging another in committing a crime.
#11
In legal terms, what does 'sua sponte' mean?
On the motion of the court
Explanation'Sua sponte' means the court takes an action without a request from either party.
#12
Under what legal principle can a person be held responsible for the actions of another if they had a duty to control that person's behavior?
Duty of care
ExplanationDuty of care holds individuals responsible for controlling others' actions if they have a specific duty to do so.
#13
Under what circumstance might a court grant a 'motion for summary judgment'?
When there is no genuine dispute of material fact
ExplanationA motion for summary judgment is granted when there is no genuine dispute of material fact, and one party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
#14
What term refers to the legal doctrine that holds employers liable for the actions of their employees while they are acting within the scope of their employment?
Respondeat superior
ExplanationRespondeat superior holds employers liable for their employees' actions during work duties.