Analyzing Persuasive Communication Quiz

Emotional appeals engage the audience's feelings to influence their attitudes or behaviors.

Social proof involves using others' actions or endorsements, such as celebrity endorsements, to influence attitudes or behaviors.

Confirmation bias predisposes individuals to favor information that confirms their existing beliefs or hypotheses.

Persuasive communication aims to sway attitudes or behaviors in the audience.

Reciprocity in persuasion involves inducing compliance by creating a sense of obligation to return a favor.

Source Credibility Theory posits that credibility enhances persuasion by fostering trust in the communicator.

The rhetorical triangle comprises the speaker, audience, and message, but not the medium.

The central route to persuasion relies on deep cognitive processing of strong, logical arguments rather than peripheral cues.

Ad hominem fallacy diverts attention from the argument by attacking the person making it.

Anchoring involves introducing a reference point, which influences subsequent judgments or decisions.

Although likability may influence persuasion, it's not typically considered a factor in source credibility.

The 'foot-in-the-door' technique involves starting with a small request to increase compliance with a larger one later.

Peripheral cues, such as the expertise of the communicator, can lead to persuasion without deep cognitive processing.

The scarcity principle suggests that emphasizing limited availability creates a sense of urgency, increasing the persuasive appeal.

Inoculation theory suggests that individuals can resist persuasion by being exposed to weakened forms of arguments, preparing them to counter stronger persuasive attempts.

The 'scrambled sentence' technique rearranges words to subtly prime certain concepts, affecting subsequent attitudes or behaviors.

Cognitive Dissonance Theory posits that individuals seek consistency between beliefs and actions, leading to psychological discomfort if they conflict.